the astros in rest. Kant considers that it is not the citizen that, when knowing, discovers the laws that conduct the object. The object, however, when known, that if adapta to the laws of the citizen inside receives that it from the knowledge. Of this form, the philosopher opens a new page in the history of the gnosiologia that would reach the most incalculable in such a way historical consequences how much theoreticians. So far, one admitted that all our knowledge if had to regulate for objects, but all the attempts to establish around them some a priori thing, by means of concepts, with which if it could have extended our knowledge, assuming such estimated, had not obtained nothing. Therefore, …

becomes it test to see if we would not be more fortunate in the problems of Metaphysics, formulating the hypothesis of that the objects must be regulated for our a priori knowledge, that establishes some thing in relation to objects before they are given in them. The copernicana revolution of Kant substitutes the realistic hypothesis of the knowledge (empirista how much in such a way racionalista) for an idealistic hypothesis. With such revolution, our philosopher concluded that it is not our sensible intuition that if he regulates for the laws of the nature of the object. In contrast, the objects if regulate to the laws of our intuitiva college. For in such a way, also the intellect if does not have to regulate for objects. The objects, while thought, if regulate for the intellect. Therefore, ' ' … in a priori knowledge if cannot add to objects nothing not to be what the pensante citizen removes of itself mesmo' '. IDEALISMO TRANSCENDENTAL and what Kant bases with the copernicana revolution of the knowledge? The call transcendental idealismo. The transcendental idealismo of Kant represented for the philosophy occidental person a point of comparable inflection to the heliocentrismo Coprnico.