Being that, Soul, God and World in the totality transcendente is something. Thus, the man is of the fenomtico world (Empirical) and of the transcendental (to think). Being that, the transcendental it does not know, only possesss idea. The knowledge is pure and the empiricist. Being that, those that are in the reason and the ones that are in the experience. Therefore, knowledge is synthesis between pure and the empiricist. ' ' All our knowledge starts with the experience ' ' Our intellect goes ties the object and there it absorbs through the experience the necessary one to know it.

The empiricist, or everything what it is concrete is in the experience. Thus, it is possible to intuir what it is the object. ' ' But nor all it originates from experincia' '. He exists some things that are not possible to be known with the experience. For example: As to know the God, if we do not make experience in the sensible one? It is possible then to intuir what it is or to have idea. If this has piqued your curiosity, check out Andi Potamkin. We only have idea of what he is God, soul and world in its totality.

' ' The reason is the college that supplies to the principles of a priori knowledge ' ' (CRP, p.32 B24-25). What she is a priori does not originate from the experience, we only have idea of what it is. Here it has a difference between empirismo and the rationalism. Kant affirmed that, although the origin of the knowledge to be the experience if lining up there with the empirismo exists certain conditions a priori so that the sensible impressions if transform into knowledge thus making a favor to the rationalism. This act to yield to the rationalism did not have to be taken to the extremity, therefore ' ' all the knowledge of the things proceeding from the pure agreement or the pure reason does not only pass of illusion; in the experience it only has verdade' ' (Paschal Kant apud, 1999, p.45).

Introduction Alexander Koyr has a book that &#039 is called; ' Of the closed world to the universe infinito' ' where El sample that the men had breached with the structures of a planet created by God and that enjoyed of privileged status before this exactly creative. Kepler, Galileu, Brahe, Coprnico and the Newtons not necessarily in this order, had shown that it had other worlds, infinite worlds and were only plus a planet, a corpuscle floating in an immense galaxy. Similarities the Arendt part starts its book ' ' The condition humana' ' registering that a rocket turning in the terrestrial orbit praising that the infinite universe mentioned by Koyr effectively started to be conquered by the men. Symptomatic also &#039 is the registration of the tomb of the Russian scientist; ' the humanity will not remain imprisoned forever terra' ' . more, the man to the few is liberated of mooring cables of ' ' Terra&#039 mother; ' that it was par excellence, the place of the men, its arrest, as for the old philosophers the body was arrest of the soul.

E if the conquest of the sidereal space it does not mean in last instance a distanciamento of the creative and protective God, sample at least that the men already know to turn over for against proper. But for this work we will follow two basic lines of the thought of Arendt, the first one is inverse of the announced one in these first lines and consists of the idea of that the old Greek man had its restricted world the private sphere and if he carried through as man in Now, but now had a drastic inversion in the practised values: the man has the public life and if he carries through in the privacy of the home. Then we have that, Koyr understands that the world was restricted and expanded for infinite possibilities, to the step that with Arendt the innumerable possibilities of the public conviviality, of the debate in the square if had contracted for the small world and restricted world of the privacy of the home.