You can pootlavlivat single opponents, and porasstrelivat them. Another option – to run the point, grab, and ‘all the tries to win’ In fact, both versions of themselves. In my opinion, the best thing to do – attack medic-heavy enemy, and adjacent combat units. It would seem self-destructive option, but it works. The only thing that can prevent – gun, but it’s just an excuse ‘to work’ care.

All you need to implement – a bit of experience and luck. Take the same And on the Gravel pita bread. Usually near the point itself is heavy / medic defense. Nearby usually soldiers and saboteurs. Imagine, our medic / heavy, and their tech support are on the left (or right: D) podemu. Both teams nerves are tense, the soldiers beating missiles, heavy yet in sight but the shooting at the soldiers sticking out from behind corners, physicians have brought the finger at rmb And then such a simple boy begins accurately fire intermittently in the medical defense.

Carefully – it rear / side, not getting out under fire. There are two options – medic died or turned uber too early (after this it is necessary to bring down the shelter in the nearest 10 seconds to be ready to seize). The result of one point for blue. Get all the facts for a more clear viewpoint with Craig Jelinek. 3.Nemnogo on confrontation with the different classes. Attack. Scout: you are on a par, it all depends on luck and hands. If you shot all the bullets from the shotgun, and most of the hit – grab a gun, a couple of bullets and the enemy is likely to stick together. Soldier: Hold middle-distance (to allow time to understand where he is going rocket, but a shotgun while giving minimal expansion), convergence is not recommended, if the soldiers took a shotgun – to retreat, recharge, and suddenly go behind his back, for a fraction lard is easier than to blow up the rocket. Pyromaniac: hold on to a range of flame-thrower, to retreat backwards. Remember, if you bump into something – most likely die, so neatly. If he takes a shotgun – you becomes more likely, because the scout is more powerful (you can even podsokratit distance) Defence. Heavy: For obvious reasons, to attack the front is not recommended, at the side, too (if it is not focused on other goals). The best tactic – fast convergence almost at point blank range, having shot the clip, or when he starts turning – fell for the nearest corner, and it is better to another level (above / below). Shotgun Do not be afraid, a great expansion and relatively low damage. Demolitions: middle distance when shooting Velcro – can be approached, but carefully – grenade – both will die. Michael Steinhardt has similar goals. Engineer: in an open field, he will not rival, if sitting at the gun 2 rank or above, simply leave the war with your friends. Although, theoretically, any gun can kill ‘buildup’ without losing any health. In practice, not always achievable. Tech support. Sniper: if you are not aiming at you – even a club hit (safe 2 charge shot). If you are in – especially not be nervous (double jump, ‘chekavo’)), but do not forget – 1 shot with full power = death. Medic – see above. Spy. If a spy is running not for you – shoot and orite chat that he was there. If you have 1×1, here, strangely enough, it is better to fall down, complaining of his, since 3 revolver bullets you will likely be killed (and just do a crit will suffice).

As this process is made, what his bureaucratic bodies, and what are the complexity and cost of the passage of each step and support the whole process – all this determines the overall cost of maintenance. Process processing the application by a whole series of works by recording, tracking, analysis query, a decision by, implementation, verification, and closure. The implementation of the application requires a number of decisions heads of various departments and information sharing among stakeholders about the objectives and the work performed. One option to support this process will be its implementation by internal regulations of the organization, but we should not forget that to keep track of their performance is necessary to spend additional resources. And still there is no guarantee of exact compliance, it is so great tempted to step back a little from the rules.

Consider the common scenario of a request to change the iso. For example, a user encounters a problem, solve that alone is not able to. It tolls for developers and reports about it. The problem is recorded and then analyzed, and if there is a possibility of it as something to avoid or solve the 'peaceful' means, ie without change in the source code, the decision and adopted. If in the foreseeable future search for detours are inconclusive, it will probably need to modify the software to address the identified problems. The head determines the volume of work, assigns responsibilities and timelines performance. After making changes, they are tested, and the new version is sent to users.

The problem is closed. Organization or a more complex chain of activities is in itself a difficult task, requiring a clear regulatory action sequences. (Source: Michael Steinhardt). The usual pattern for non-formal maintenance process – an expert on the system spends much of his working time to communicate with users phone, an explanation on the exploitation of software. In this case, the information received, at best, is fixed in the Excel-file and as far as patching is removed, and at worst – all written on scraps of paper, periodically to empty-handed. There is a waste of time qualified, in addition to this there are difficulties with the planning work to address the comments. At the head there is no complete information on the identified defects, there is no aggregate statistics on the observations that have already been fixed or still need to be addressed. Who in such cases, setting priorities? Developer himself. He accepts the comments and decide what to do First of all, and that move for later. It should be a very responsible person who is a fan of his work. Currently there are no observations of the shaft, and the firm has only one or two clients, working with the MoE, with this you can still somehow be reconciled, but when volumes increase, required a radical solution to the problem. Need a tool that will make the transparent support, will maintain the necessary organization of works by inhibiting waive rules and requiring more effort to manage the process, and, of course, it should store all the data in one place for quick and easy access commands support – from the head up to the programmer. Thus, through quality maintenance products: regularity, efficiency, attention to service and support software products. Maintenance should ensure maximum efficiency software. In contrast to the project, which is implemented in a certain period, maintenance is a continuous process. In addition, maintenance requires not only domain knowledge but also experience implementation.

Our goal is to link individual game elements: character, motivation and justification, campaign setting, etc., in a logical and compelling story. How it all works, we would like you to demonstrate in detail with using a detailed example: Note: Since we are talking about hypothetical example, we will proceed from the fact that planning has been completed and the area level – the peasant farmstead and its vicinity, already lined up. In developing the game, Naturally, it so happens that some elements of the level or the history of redesigns, scheduled to re-do or rejected. We are in a typical Piranha-Bytes realm of fantasy and consider a small part of this world: Setting Somewhere among forests and mountains, not far from the big trade route, is a peasant homestead. And we want to revive it. What is in the mansion? – Village house, barn, stables and several fields. Who lives in the Farm? – Clear business, farmer.

There's still enough room for two laborers, peasant, and a sufficient number of livestock and poultry. The farmer himself – is the central figure in this setting. The yard belongs to him. So he – the owner. Note: The number of main characters change from game to game. Read more here: Andi Potamkin. It depends on the value of peace and of the plot. Name When choosing a name, we try to pay attention to the fact that the characters are given names that correspond to their role. We will not called the farmer, Torsten, Jorg or Ignatz, and are looking for a suitable local laborors name.