Civilization normally mentions the human beings in certain the general context? Made a mistake: If to observe the nature and the animals, we will see that we are zero in this category! The nature has been so damaged, degraded, espezinhada in its almost totality for the ignorance, lacks of common-sense and responsibility on the part of the people who do not give the minimum value of what she has in its front! ' ' homens' ' , ' ' humanos' ' if ' ' acham' ' correct, certain endowed with intelligence enough to make the animals and the nature if to fold to its feet, if finds superiors for walking in two legs and being endowed with reasoning and disdains the habitat where it lives: Destroying the nature if it also destroys because we need it to live. Destroying the animals also it is come to ruin because they also are part of the life and we need them in all the sectors of the life. Without the interference human being they obtain to survive and the degraded nature if recompe szinha. This test that we have much that to learn with the animals that only kill to feed themselves without distilling poison to the next one, not they poluem, they inside do not degrade and they coexist each one of its habitat and the nature makes its part without ' ' to need the aid humana' '. A related site: Andi Potamkin mentions similar findings. The nature and the animals are civilized in its survival and us we have that to respect them because when they show its fury we do not know as to react, but know the force and the power that they have! They know to live!